Comment on January 14th, 2009.
Any book that compares itself to “Pilgrim’s Progress” on the front cover has been red-flagged right off the bat as probably not that great.
Comment on January 18th, 2009.
I agree with Dan. Plus I live under a rock, apparently. I hadn’t heard about this book until now, and Mr. H tells me I am already late. I’ll probably read it right after I finish Left Behind. Heh.
Comment on January 19th, 2009.
I was too coerced into reading this book as a ‘must read’. Usually, such books leave me behind in disappointment, like “Left Behind”. This read however hit me pretty hard. As Father Neo stated, it will strike deep if you have girls of your own, as I do, but the most poignant part for me was what unfolded at the Shack itself. I found it emotionally stirring, thought provoking, and spiritually stimulating. This book was penned by the author as a story for his children. Not the typical Christian fiction written for commercial enterprise. It’s a quick read, and you may be surprised how it speaks to you!
Comment on February 5th, 2009.
Read the book on the flight back from Haiti this past Sunday. I hadn’t heard of it till the weekend. Definitely a quick and interesting read.
I didn’t care for the bit about God doesn’t want Christians but rather people who have the right “relationship. And there aren’t rules, just “relationships.”
But this is definitely a good book for seekers.
Comment on May 13th, 2009.
I’m late joining this one and have to say its the most powerful modern fiction story about God I’ve read. I agree with Father Neo, God is like the Oracle in Matrix. Can you smell the cookies? The book was recommended to me last winter by a very close spiritual friend when I was struggling with painful decisions requiring a lot of discernment. I cried and was so moved and inspired by the modern approachable relationship of the Holy Trinity that I bought it for several people. I then asked them who was it written for, believers or non-believers? You might be surprised the illumination and closeness it brings to those of us who already believe, if we give it a chance. My friends both assumed it was for non-believers, or seekers. Are they right?
Comments can contain some xhtml. Names and emails are required (emails aren't displayed), url's are optional.